When Freedom Isn’t Free: The Cost of Forced Equality in America
Hey folks, Earnest Mann here. Today’s episode comes straight from the inbox. A flood of emails rolled in, all echoing a similar question — what the hell happened to personal liberty and individual freedom? So, I packed everything into one giant episode that tackles the uncomfortable truths most people won’t touch.
Are We Still Free to Choose? The Hidden Cost of Equality Laws
I explore how laws meant to ensure equality have evolved into systems that strip people of their personal agency. Whether it's renting out a room in your own home or how neighborhoods are shaped by forced policies, I question the fairness behind these regulations. If someone doesn’t want a Satanist living in their Christian household, should that not be their right? Personal freedom, in many of these situations, takes a backseat to state-imposed mandates.
Cultural Identity or Bigotry? Walking the Line
I talk about cultural self-preservation — a concept now seen as outdated or even hateful. But ask yourself: why is it wrong for people, whether they're Italian, Jewish, Black, Amish, or anything else, to want to live among those who share their values and heritage? I reflect on how we used to have neighborhoods that functioned through mutual respect, and how government-enforced integration didn't always yield harmony.
Real-Life Examples of Hypocrisy in Government Policy
From governors living in exclusive mansions to how Amish communities are allowed to live in peace, I expose the glaring double standards. Meanwhile, regular citizens are told who they can live next to, rent to, and work with — and if you disagree, you're immediately labeled a racist or bigot.
I’m Not Left or Right — I’m Just Looking at What Works
This isn’t a conservative rant or liberal agenda. I’m a rationalist. I don’t care about ideological labels. I care about what works. And what works is allowing people to live freely, to associate by common values when they choose, and to stop criminalizing preference as if it's hatred.
I would like to meet - both online and in person - individuals interested in discussing ideas on what really needs to be changed, to improve the quality of our lives.
So if you have a suggestion for an episode topic, or simply want to reach out to me for help, you can reach me via my website's contact page - https://theearnestmannshow.com/aboutcontact - and I will get back to you ASAP.
I'm not promising miracles, but my advice is often a hell of a lot better - and certainly cheaper - than a therapist!.
If you're interested in my new Incredible tote bag, which goes for a small donation for a very good cause - https://theearnestmannshow.com/earnest-stuff-vn9f-1qls - THANK YOU!
If you could throw a cup of coffee my way, that would ABSOLUTELY be appreciated! - https://ko-fi.com/earnestmann - THANK YOU!
You can also listen to any of my many previous episodes on my website at - https://theearnestmannshow.com/episodes
© 2020 - 26 The Earnest Mann Show
Greetings. Generally speaking, I don't like to make long episodic episodes. Um,
I try to wrap up, you know, what I'm saying in about, yeah, 10 minutesish.
But what happened was was that I've gotten numerous emails, quite a few
actually, that keep asking me more or less
um a question about the same subject, which basically amounts to personal
liberties and freedoms. So, I decided to
address that and put it all in one big ass gigantic episode for you to um well
scrutinize. And um that's that's what it is. And so
having said that um this is a extremely controversial
subject and uh so yeah so I'm I'm here to do
that because that's what you wanted and that's what I'm going to do.
So without further ado, here it is. due to relentless social
conditioning that we have had in the last 30 40 years against actual thought thinking
um that I don't know I don't know what else to say. So I I'm totally open um if
you I don't know send me hate mail or death threats or whatnot.
But regardless of that that's what this show's about. This is what I do. And I
talk about the untoable. I talk about things that no one else will. Even
even if in their heart of hearts, they know it's true,
but they're afraid to speak it. And and I understand. I I I totally do. I
totally understand. So bearing all that in mind
then I can go forward and you know talk about this and what
this is that I'm talking about is the unthinkable about
uh concerning things of you know uh issues such as seeducation say for
instance Now,
let me ask you this. Does it seem fair to you?
Is this fair? Because they, you know, we love to kick that idea of fairness
around. We love to do that. Does it seem fair to you to impose certain rules and
regulations about how you can, should, or where you live or your attitudes
towards those who live around you? All of that, just that alone,
is that fair? because there are many people for you
know many years for instance we've had HOAs
which uh for any of you that don't know that's a homeowners association and they
typically have a whole bunch of rules and regulations of what you cannot and
cannot can I'm sorry can and cannot do with your property
uh including the color you paint it and a whole trove of other damn things that
you can and cannot do. And if you're someone who can laugh at this and you
happen to have been on the receiving end of HOAs, you know what I'm talking about. Okay?
But I'm talking about something much larger on a sociological scale. And what
that is is that when you have
again and this is totally at the time when these things are created it appears
on the on the surface it appears is that it's just and good and it's all good and
just and all that but it is imposed upon you nonetheless
just like a [ __ ] HOA. Now,
bear in mind, I told you that this is going to sound very controversial and
I'll get named a thousand terrible names and whatnot. And whether or not you
choose to believe those things are true, of course, is entirely up to you. I'm not going to sit here sit here and with
this kind of idiocy and defend myself. I'm simply going to say what I'm saying,
but here it is. For instance, if you're in a neighborhood, say it's
1950s and we know about well the terrible 50s when it came to, you know,
um racism and all that. And uh if you're in the let's say even
if you're not a private homeowner in the suburbs, but you're in the a city neighborhood or something. And then
there was this thing that came around with equal this and equal that. And then there was the turmoil of whether they be
blacks, Latinos or I don't know Jews or whatever the case may have been of
moving into your neighborhood under the opaces of freedom and all that other
[ __ ] And that's that's fine. I get that argument. But here's my point. You see,
you can't have a huge argument that is not contested. I mean, not
realistically, it's not contested in any opposite uh point of view at all. You
can't have that in that situation. Whereas everything has to be for the
greater good, for the greater sociological good, for all this that it's essentially um well, it's satinct
and it be it became and it is satinct throughout the land
and you and you have no choice. Hear me out. Don't crucify me yet. Just
hear me out. Let's say for instance that you have a
property and you want to rent a room. Okay, fine.
And um you're supposed to have some sort of you know process to
filter to go through uh you know some various an application or various things
to check out the person. But let's just say you're an a devout
Christian of some form or denomination and the person despite the fact that
they may have lived in their previous residence and they're good and they pay their rent on time, they're gainfully
employed and all these everything that should be on that level. It checks all
the boxes. This should be good and it's good except for the fact as I said
you're a very devout Christian and the person who wants to move in is a very
devout Satanist. Now
can you understand? Is there anyone left out there that can understand uh let's
say in your home as the Christian person that owns this home and I'm not I'm
happily agnostic. I am not endorsing Christianity. Okay. But I'm saying, do
you think that a devout Satanist with multiple headto toe Satanist tattoos and
pretty much a bizarre look and whatnot despite all the other elements should have a fair and equal opportunity under
law to live in that person's home?
Do you think that that's going to be a good fit? Something tells me it's not.
And that is my point is is that where law or the ideals of law or whatnot supersede what should be self-evident.
And if I were such a devout Christian person, I sure as hell not
would not want such a person living in my home.
Period. End of story. It ends there. Ah, but that is not law.
And law states that under equal this and equal that and equal equal, here we go.
Everything's equal and d you cannot refuse them, you know, uh the
opportunity to live there with you. And um despite the fact that from any
metric of common sense or whatnot, these people are not going to get along.
But according to the law, the law by the state, equal housing, equal opportunity.
You're a bigot, you're a this, you're a that. And so the person that's renting
the room, they can't because of that because well essentially they can't.
And that is my point about the situation with everything
under the sun being by powers beyond us being declared uh well lawful, legal.
And if you're not doing that, then you're not following the law.
However, the people who make these laws, generally speaking,
overwhelmingly speaking, um, and I'm not even talking about their ethnicity. Uh, they could be, you know,
whatever race. Generally, many of them are white. But, um, you know, you have a governor,
for instance. Well, they get to live in a [ __ ] governor's mansion.
Now, why nobody is, you know, questioned the fact that just because here in the
21st century, um, that just because they're a governor, they automatically get a
governor's mansion to live in. Hey, again, that's besides me. And that is
what I'm talking about. That kind of thing. In other words, the point being is that the powers that be
that want you to live your life as you see fit, the way that you enjoy your
life or want to enjoy your life. They don't have to put up with the
unpleasantries or anything that they are proposing or forcing you to do.
That alone, just that, just that alone, that one factor. Now,
you see, way back, and I'm old enough to remember this, way back in New York
City, we had burrows and well, we had neighborhoods, and we generally got
along. We got along because we had
neighborhoods. So, the Jews lived over here and the
black folks lived over there and Latinos lived over here and whatnot. But generally speaking, I'm not saying it
was perfect. Not by a long shot. I'm not saying that. But generally speaking, we got along. We
respected each other's boundaries because
birds of a feather do flock together. And there's a reason for that. And that's okay. There's nothing. inherently
evil or bad or wrong about that.
But that is not the situation we live in
today. This is all across America. And hell, I I can't speak for other
countries because I don't know. I don't know. I I haven't lived there. I
don't know. But the little bit that I do know is that pretty much the same program has
been forced upon the people in various countries and just what the
little bit I do know about in particular in in Europe and the UK there is a
significant uh let's say portion of the French population
that wants it to be well French. French meaning uh for lack of a better term.
Let me see. White people. Yeah. They wanted to be French. They want to
be white and this that and the other. And they're not wanting to bother anybody else,
but they just want they want that homogeneous um situation. Again,
this is not something wrong or evil. It is what it is.
And there is nothing wrong with that. What is wrong
is when a government quote unquote chooses under their ideas and idealisms
and whatnot to force certain ideological precedents
upon you. And that's what pisses people off.
That is what the people many people in Europe are going through and have been for some time and you know uh one of the
biggest cases the the data that I do know is of the UK
and it's bad and it's bad because Britain's
are no longer Britain because they're not allowed
they're not allowed to have any cultural identity of their own whatsoever. None.
It's It's bad. It's evil. You're just evil. Bad white people. It's terrible.
You're just You're just horrible. So what I'm saying is
is the hypocrisy of the argument that for instance in the u what I remember in
the mid early7s and this had to do with the integration of public schools and
and neighborhoods and whatnot. It was an utter nightmare and catastrophe.
Totally completely and absolutely. I know because I lived there. I lived
through it and all of my friends, neighbors, family members, and every damnbody else also lived through it.
What it is is that you can't impose a situation
and pretend and then pretend the hypocrisy of this does not exist. You
can't impose something and say, "Okay, you will do this. you will allow these people, you will you will do this this
that and the other and not see the hypocrisy that if there are people I
don't care if you call them racist or you know whatever racist or homophobic
or bigots or whatever term you choose to use
but you can't use that against them which they have for 30 40 years. You
can't do that. But by the same token, ignore the fact that there's absolutely
nothing wrong with people of their own
like, whether they be black or Jewish or Chinese or whatever the case may be, that they desire
to be amongst themselves. Does anyone out there can you see the
contradiction here? If they want to, generally speaking, be
amongst themselves, then you need to lay the hell off them
and allow them to do that. For instance, just one simple example of this, here in
the US, we have and have had for many
generations the Amish in Pennsylvania. You don't see things in the news, you
know, crazily and constantly, you know, banging down the the Amish or for, well,
you you're not being inclusive. Why won't you let black people try in Jews
and this that and the other? You don't see that. It's not It's not. It's virtually
non-existent that kind of protest. And the only purely off the top of my head, the only reason why you're not that
doesn't happen is for the utter even by even by current standards of
irrationality. Even by that you're not it's such a proposition is
beyond utterly and utterly beyond the pale of any reason whatsoever because it
is self-evident that this is their own homogeneous
culture they want they the people that are there the Amish
yeah they want to keep that now besides Besides the fact me personally,
I think personally people [ __ ] driving horse and buggies
in the 21st century and all the other [ __ ] that to me is like crazy crazy to
me, you know, it's crazy crazy. But but
at least they're to themselves. They're not screwing with anybody and
they're not trying to push their culture or anything on anyone else.
They're a homogeneous culture. Simply put, they just want to live their
again to me somewhat, I don't know, backward and and
illogical existence, but that's the way they want to. and they're
not they're not [ __ ] with anyone. They're not bothering anyone. Okay, so boom, let them let them do their Amish
thing and they sure as hell make a lot of money from building the very high
quality Amish furniture that's sold nationally. So, I mean, you know, yeah, they're engaging in the capitalist
system. They haven't, I guess, gotten quite
around to, I don't know, [ __ ] electricity and cars yet. But hey,
you know, hey, that's their deal. But when you have a neighborhood, city this that and the other and the other aspects
of various groups and whatnot is forced upon you,
that is inherently wrong. And on it's wrong on multiple levels and one of them
is that the people who have lived there
forever. Let's say you have a a an acc a um a community of Italian people or say
Scott Irish and this this thing is forced upon you. So the other the other
people and their race and culture and what is injected upon you then that is
again over time whether it's 5 10 20 50 years whatever the [ __ ] it is doesn't
matter. Yeah there's a lot of resentment that builds
because birds of a feather flock together and they just want to be left
to their own devices. That's all. And what all I'm trying to
say that is not evil despite what woke tells you and whatnot. There's nothing
wrong with that. As a matter of fact, the greatest most productive years of
this country came from those very same people who
were um divided in that sense.
They were divided but they yet they worked together but they had their own
cultural their own cultural identity and you know they got
done work they went back they went back home. So,
by now, God only knows I will get 10,000 emails or hate mail or
whatnot and then you're a fascist, you're a bigot, you're a racist, you're a this, you're a that.
what I am trying to explain what works for societies and
they point out for instance and I don't know if there's any kind of you know any
kind of conspiracy about this cuz I generally speaking don't go into conspiracy [ __ ] I really don't but they
love to talk about Rome all the time American historians and there's 10,000
things about Rome and said yes and and Rome was one of most culturally diverse
nations of the world.
But the fact is in reality it wasn't.
You know why? because all the way through the history of Rome and well especially since the
republic era um they all of the city councils all the
important controlling mechanisms were not only Roman quote unquote
not only were they Roman but the areas were uh very um
Oh, damn. What's the term? They were very segregated. Not only, and I'm not talking just about
economic um, you know, stratification. It wasn't just that. It wasn't just
that. It was social stratification cuz certainly that existed. Absolutely.
But yeah, um, they had various again groups of people. Yes. from all over the
land. But those pe they lived in their what's a
common term hoods. There you go. They lived in their hoods. And so they
interacted and some were I don't know the percentage right now. And some were legal, you know, Romans with Roman
citizenship, but they weren't members of the Senate.
That's a fact. That is a historical fact. So, um yeah, the point is is that
if um you know, if you're in in any kind of uh neighborhood that we once had
and if they didn't want people and I'm again, this is not I'm not talking about
the justification. I'm simply about what you you are supposed to want. I'm not
talking about oh I don't see any region. I mean I I have a place to rent. He said
the police is a he's a mass murderer and and a Satanist but that would be
judgmental. I don't want to do that because you would make me a bad person. Sure. I I
rent my uh room and my home personally because I'm I'm not a racist and I'm not
a this and I'm not a that and [ __ ] on adinium. It's about the dissatisfaction
that people those and even the people that are property owners or whatnot are
not given a choice, a real choice.
And for those of you that have been labeled, I don't know if you're
listening to this, arch conservatives or right-wingers or whatnot,
you know, I you know, if if other people are going to look at me and say, "Well, he's yes, he's obviously a
conservative." No, I'm [ __ ] not. I'm not. I make that perfect. I am not in any way
by certain well pretty broad metrics. I'm not a conservative.
So, you see, I said I am not a conservative, but I'm certainly not a
liberal because it's kind of sort of when you
analyze it, it's two sides of the same dysfunctional, [ __ ] up coin. I'm a
rationalist. I'm a realist. I look at what works. I don't care what
side of the coin coin it's on. I care about what works.
At least I don't I do not claim to be an absolute historian with letters behind
my name. I don't claim that. I just, you know, I just know what I happen to know
from the studies that I've made. And I know what seems to work. But I do
know also this when you take entire segments of society
and you start telling them with their property what they can and cannot do
what they or rather whom they can rent to and whom they can't all these things
of that nature I don't care if you attach it to race or
religion or whatnot here. I'm going just say this as as as
crazily as I can, okay? It's broad. Again, I told you this would be amazing
and shocking. If you're someone who's anti-semitic and you don't want to rent to a Jew,
that should be your choice. Your choice as an individal
agency to tell you, hey, you can't do this. Yeah, [ __ ] you.
I'm not talking about whether it's right or whether it's wrong. I'm talking about personal liberty.
Now, I also despite what you may think
that is, well, he's maybe he's a he's because it has to be pegged. They have to be well, he's obviously a well, he's
a libertarian. No. No. I think a lot of libertarian um you know ideology is is
just stupid. It's not that. No,
it's about what historically is show what works for people how people the
best way. I'm not saying it's ideal. I'm saying how best they function
and get along. And I don't know about you,
but um generally speaking, if possible, I think it's great to have at least a a
good, you know, surface functional level, you know, of functionality with
your neighbors. You're It's very ideal if you're not hating your [ __ ]
neighbors and they in turn don't hate you. I think that's a good thing. I think the more you the or rather the
less you hate each other that's a good thing and so if you're again kind of sort of
birds of a feather whatever that may be that's better
that is what is better in my humble
opinion. So, assuming
I'm alive tomorrow,
I hope you enjoyed this rant or whatever your take may be on it. I certainly
um tried to put something out there for you to think about.
Otherwise, until next time,
this is Earnest and it's all I've got
for today.
